-
Step 01
Understand why the collateral is somewhere else
Construction lending assumes work happens on the site an inspector can visit. In modular, most of the value is created in a factory the lender does not control, on modules the borrower does not yet own. Everything else follows from that.
- CFMA · Financing modular construction: overcoming cash flow and equity challenges — deposit schedule, progress billing, LTC haircut, retainage
- Pillar 02 · Cost & schedule — 'Financing is the binding constraint'
- Glossary — Finance section
You should now be able to answerAt what point does title to a module pass, what secures the material deposit before that, and who bears the loss if the factory fails mid-production? -
Step 02
Model the deposit-to-draw gap
A 5% LOI deposit six months out, 25%+ for materials three months out, then 30–35% at module start and completion, invoiced every two to four weeks — against a lender draw schedule that pays for installed work. The gap is equity, and it is why modular projects need more of it.
- CFMA article — the billing schedule figures
- Developer's trail — Step 4, 'Build a capital stack that survives the deposit schedule'
DoTake a real or hypothetical 100-unit project. Lay factory billing against your standard draw schedule month by month. Note the peak gap and how many months it persists.You should now be able to answerWhat structures — factory inspection you trust, title transfer at station, escrowed deposits, a manufacturer completion guarantee — would let you advance against modules in production? -
Step 03
Distinguish backlog from pipeline
Factories fail on pipeline and survive on backlog. Harbinger cited a long-term pipeline of forty-plus projects while issuing a WARN notice. Price a factory's fixed costs against contracted, funded orders only.
- Pillar 09 · Consolidation year — 'Harbinger: the third strike'
- Daily Republic — Harbinger hopes new work will stave off closure (2026)
- The Real Deal — Veev shutting down (Nov 2023)
You should now be able to answerOf the orders in the deck, how many are executed contracts with financing closed, and how many months of line time do they represent? -
Step 04
Place the factory in its tier
Platforms with balance sheets, regional specialists merging for scale, and venture-era factories on the next raise: the 2026 transactions drew the lines. Tier predicts survival better than technology, mission or customer logos.
- Pillar 09 — 'Four deals' and 'Three tiers'
- Factory Ledger — ownership and status columns
- MBI · Sunbelt Modular partnership announcement (Sep 2026) — a platform roll-up in the trade body's own words
You should now be able to answerWho carries this factory's fixed costs through two quarters with no new orders, and what is that party's own runway? -
Step 05
Read the one public filer
Boxabl's Nasdaq listing means that, for the first time, a volumetric factory must disclose output, revenue and cost quarterly. Whatever you think of the company, its 10-Qs are the only audited production data in the sector. Read them for the disclosure pattern, not the stock.
- Boxabl 1H 2026 10-Q summary
- HousingWire — Boxabl begins trading as BXBL (Jul 2026)
- The Crowdscale — Boxabl's filings, read adversarially (2025) — critical source; useful for the filing references
You should now be able to answerWhat unit-cost and units-per-quarter figures can you extract from the filings, and how do they compare to the capacity claims made before listing? -
Step 06
Expose the denominator in the market sizing
You will be shown $111 billion, $208 billion, $229 billion. Global forecasts diverge by a factor of two because 'modular' has no agreed boundary. The addressable market for a North American volumetric factory is closer to MBI/FMI's $20.5 billion, and its share is five percent.
- Pillar 01 · Market — 'Why the numbers disagree' and 'North America at five percent'
- Pillar 07 · Reading the trade body — 'The number'
- MBI Industry Analysis — the release; note what is member-gated
You should now be able to answerWhich market figure is in the deck, what does it count, and what is the borrower's realistic addressable share of it? -
Step 07
Price the frictions a site-built deal doesn't carry
Multi-jurisdiction approvals, oversize transport, prevailing-wage exposure in some states, in-transit insurance, and — for steel high-rise — embodied-carbon compliance under new bylaws. None appears in a stick-built pro forma; all belong in yours.
- Reciprocity Tracker
- Pillar 08 · Prevailing wage — 'Twelve months, three states'
- Pillar 06 · Sustainability — 'Policy is forcing the comparison'
You should now be able to answerWhich of these five frictions apply to the deal in front of you, and where are they in the sources and uses?
Check yourself
If you can answer these without looking, you have finished the trail. If not, the step number tells you where to go back.
- Explain why factory work is treated as unsecured and name two structures that would change it.
- State the peak deposit-to-draw gap on a 100-unit project in months and as a share of cost.
- Give the borrower's contracted backlog in months of line time, distinct from pipeline.
- Place the factory in a tier and name who carries its fixed costs.
- Quote one audited output or cost figure from a public filing in the sector.
- Name the market figure in the deck and what it counts.
- List the modular-specific frictions priced into your underwriting.